Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-05-07 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-05-07 Senate Journal Page 2187 HB 275 SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 275(FIN) am S was before the Senate in third reading on reconsideration. Senator Jacko moved that SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 275(FIN) am S be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 3. Senator Adams objected. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 275(FIN) am S be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: SENATE CS CSHB 275(FIN) AM S Return to Second for Specific Amendment YEAS: 10 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kelly, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little,Salo, Zharoff 1993-05-07 Senate Journal Page 2188 HB 275 Rieger changed from "Nay" to "Yea". and so, the bill was not returned to second reading. Senator Jacko moved that SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 275(FIN) am S be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 4. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 275(FIN) am S be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: SENATE CS CSHB 275(FIN) AM S Return to Second for Specific Amendment YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Rieger changed from "Nay" to "Yea". and so, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Jacko offered Amendment No. 4 : Page 1, line 10 - Page 2, line 4: Delete all material Insert new bill sections to read: "* Sec. 2. AS 16.51.020(b) is amended to read: 1993-05-07 Senate Journal Page 2189 HB 275 (b) Twelve members of the board shall be seafood processors: eight of the seafood processors must have an annual payroll in the state of more than $2,500,000 [$1,000,000 OR MORE]; four of the seafood processors must have an annual payroll in the state of $50,000 - $2,500,000. Twelve [$1,000,000. FIVE] members of the board must be engaged in commercial fishing. The governor, to the extent practicable, shall appoint as commercial fishing members of the board persons engaged in commercial fishing in a fishery management region of the state in the same proportion that the region contributes, or is expected to contribute during the next year, to the total salmon marketing tax collected under AS43.76.110 - 43.76.130. One member of the board shall be a lay person selected by the governor. * Sec. 3. AS 16.51.020(b) is repealed and reenacted to read: (b) Twelve members of the board shall be seafood processors: eight of the seafood processors must have an annual payroll in the state of more than $2,500,000; four of the seafood processors must have an annual payroll in the state of $50,000 - $2,500,000. Twelve members of the board must be engaged in commercial fishing. One member of the board shall be a lay person selected by the governor." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 6, following line 15: Insert a new subsection to read: "(c) Notwithstanding AS16.51.020(b), as amended by sec. 3 of this Act, a person who is serving as a member of the board of directors of the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute on the day before the effective date of sec. 3 of this Act may continue to serve as a member of the board for the remainder of the term to which the person was appointed." 1993-05-07 Senate Journal Page 2190 HB 275 Page 6, line 18: Delete "Section 6" Insert "Section 7" Page 6, following line 18: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 12. Section 3 of this Act takes effect upon the repeal of AS43.76.110, 43.76.120, and 43.76.130." Senator Jacko moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 4. Senator Duncan objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SENATE CS CSHB 275(FIN) AM S Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 4 was adopted. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 275(FIN) am S was automatically in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 275(FIN) am S "An Act relating to the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute and a salmon marketing tax; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-05-07 Senate Journal Page 2191 HB 275 SENATE CS CSHB 275(FIN) AM S Third Reading - On Reconsideration YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Duncan, Frank, Kelly, Kerttula, Little, Miller, Pearce, Rieger, Salo, Sharp Nays: Adams, Ellis, Halford, Jacko, Leman, Lincoln, Phillips, Taylor, Zharoff Ellis changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Phillips changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 275(FIN) am S passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Taylor moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SENATE CS CSHB 275(FIN) AM S Effective Date YEAS: 17 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Jacko, Zharoff and so, the effective date clause was adopted. 1993-05-07 Senate Journal Page 2192 HB 275 SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 275(FIN) am S was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.